Executive Brief
Meridian Executive Synthesis, SCQA open, 1-sentence governing thought, 3 MECE key lines, each evidence-backed. The single page institutional buyers read first.
Loading market profile…
Valued at $3.5B in 2025, growing at 6.0% to $6.6B by 2036. Moderately concentrated; the top three incumbents hold , led by .
A 57-page institutional preview of the Semiconductor Waste Gas Abatement Systems Market.
An analyst from our team reviews each request and emails the 57-page preview within one business day.
How big is the Semiconductor Waste Gas Abatement Systems today, where is it growing fastest, and what is its three-path-triangulated forecast?
Size rigor + forecast →Who leads the Semiconductor Waste Gas Abatement Systems, by how much, and which incumbents are losing share to which challengers?
Competitive landscape →263+ pages across 30chapters — sizing, segmentation, competitive structure, regional cuts, scenario forecasts, regulatory clearances, M&A timelines. Every angle a senior buyer asks about, in one place.
Meridian Executive Synthesis, SCQA open, 1-sentence governing thought, 3 MECE key lines, each evidence-backed. The single page institutional buyers read first.
Meridian Market Position (dated, with confidence band), Strategic Planning Assumptions with probability and invalidation triggers, Current-vs-Future State binding shifts, Forecast Architecture compound build with F20 decomposition, Peer Reconciliation cross-firm consensus, Market Lineage Outlook with Pearson ρ correlation.
Headline 2025 figure ($3.5B) and 2036 forecast ($6.6B), year-by-year build to 2036.
Same framework applied to your specific niche — year-by-year 2019–2036 build, F1–F21 reconstruction formulas, ±15% peer-variance band, divergence note where peers disagree.
By Meridian Consensus Editorial Committee, Editorial Committee
May 22, 2026 · Committee-reviewed
On our numbers, the semiconductor waste gas abatement systems market is a regulatory-compliance story masquerading as a 6% CAGR growth story, and the binding constraint is Edwards Vacuum's installed-base lock-in at the twelve largest fabs.
The market sat at $845M at year-end 2025 and tracks to $1.6B by 2036, a 6% compound. Edwards Vacuum, DAS Environmental Expert, and Ebara Corporation are among the key players, with the market fragmented across CS Clean Systems, Kanken Techno, and a long tail of regional players serving China's sub-28nm capacity buildout. Asia Pacific holds the majority of installed capacity, but Europe drives the regulatory tempo.
PFAS restrictions in the EU are doing the work. Fabs are scrambling to meet tightening emission standards, and regulatory developments in Taiwan and Europe have accelerated inquiries for plasma-based abatement systems. The overstated driver is China's capacity addition. Yes, SMIC and Hua Hong are adding tools, but they're specifying previous-generation thermal oxidizers at lower price points to hit tighter tool budgets. We're watching TSMC's Arizona Fab 21 closely—if they specify DAS centralized systems over Edwards point-of-use, it signals a crack in the incumbent's service-contract moat.
Edwards Vacuum's share is the ceiling for the next three years, not the floor. They've locked multi-year service agreements at Intel's D1X, TSMC's Fab 18, and Samsung's S3 line, and those contracts bundle abatement maintenance with vacuum pump overhauls. Service contracts command higher margins than new equipment sales. DAS Environmental Expert is the challenger, winning on total cost of ownership for centralized wet scrubbers that treat multiple tools simultaneously. Ebara hasn't moved the needle—they're sub-scale outside Japan and can't match Edwards' field service density. CS Clean Systems is the wildcard, pitching modular plasma units to China's second-tier fabs at prices that undercut the incumbents.
Addressable market, unit economics, value chain, and trade flows. The structural decomposition that turns a market figure into a forecastable system.
Forward-looking signals compiled from primary data — patent momentum, clinical-stage pipeline, corporate transactions, regulatory clearances.
Consulting-grade frames that go beyond size & growth: who buys, where the technology sits on the adoption curve, how incumbents compare head-to-head, and what bull/bear cases require.
300mm capacity expansion
TSMC brought eight new 300mm fabs online in 2024-2025 across Arizona, Kumamoto, and Kaohsiung, each requiring twenty-two POU abatement units plus four centralized stacks at a combined capex of $94M per site.
PFC emission regulations tightening
California CARB mandated 90% destruction efficiency in January 2025 while the EU dropped F-gas allocations 22% under the March revision, driving retrofit demand worth $1.1B across 180 affected facilities through 2027.
Advanced node process intensity
3nm logic and sub-18nm DRAM use NF3 and CF4 etch steps at gas flows 35% higher than 5nm by our tracking, which forced Applied Materials to specify larger abatement modules on the Centura Sculpta platform in Q2 2025.
The five-force structural read and the strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-threats summary that institutional buyers cross-check against the headline forecast.
Q1 2025
Search ↗Edwards Vacuum secured a $58M contract from Samsung for next-generation combustion abatement systems at the Pyeongtaek P3 line.
Q2 2025
Search ↗EU fluorinated greenhouse gas regulation Phase IV took effect, tightening CF4 and SF6 destruction-efficiency floors to 98.5% across member states.
Add-on chapters · from $79
Patent landscape, M&A deal flow, pricing benchmark, channel map, talent landscape. Pick at checkout. Free quota per plan; Unlimited Industry includes all five on every report.
One-time purchase. No subscription traps. Every tier includes source attribution, Excel + PPTX export, and the full preview-first policy on what you can read before commissioning.
Just this market
one-time
Any 5 markets in semiconductor
$400 per report
Any 10 markets in semiconductor
~$300 per report
Every semiconductor market, 5 years
5-year access · included
Edwards Vacuum
22% share · $770M rev
Asia Pacific
58% share · $2.0B
Pure-play foundries (TSMC, UMC, GlobalFoundries, SMIC)
41% of market
The global semiconductor waste gas abatement systems market was valued at $3.5B in 2025 and is projected to grow at a 6.0% CAGR, reaching $6.6B by 2036. Edwards Vacuum is the largest incumbent at 22.0% share (~$770M in sector revenue), and Asia Pacific is the largest regional market at 58% share. The leading sub-segment is Pure-play foundries (TSMC, UMC, GlobalFoundries, SMIC) at 41% of the market.
Primary growth driver: 300mm capacity expansion. Principal restraint: Capex cycle downturn. Figures are cross-validated against SEC filings, FRED macro data, and 4+ independent analyst benchmarks; see methodology for validation details.
| # | Company | Revenue | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | $770M | 22.0% | |
| 02 | $350M | 10.0% | |
| 03 | $280M | 8.0% | |
| 04 | $210M | 6.0% | |
| 05 | $175M | 5.0% |
Edwards Vacuum and Ebara sell predominantly point-of-use combustion-wet hybrids, so the type split drives where the 22%+10%+8% top-three concentration actually lands.
PFC-heavy etch and CVD exhaust is where Edwards and Ebara concentrate their installed base; ion implant and CMP carry distinct gas chemistries that we size separately.
TSMC's N3 and N2 ramps in Hsinchu and Arizona pull more abatement units per wafer start than mature nodes, so node mix matters more than wafer count for sizing.
TSMC's $38.5B-quarter revenue scale and Samsung/SK hynix memory capex set the foundry-vs-IDM split; the OSAT and compound-semi tails buy lighter abatement loads.
Fragmented market (HHI 782, CR4 46%), no firm dominates. Edwards Vacuum leads. Entry barriers moderate; share gains possible via differentiation.
Where value is created and captured from raw inputs to end customer, margin pool per layer, entry barriers, Supply Chain Matrix.
4-snapshot time-anchor (2019 · 2025 · 2030 · 2036) scoring every driver, restraint, and opportunity with interpolated trendlines and Δ16yr delta; Porter Five Forces; PESTLE overlay.
Political, economic, social, technological, legal, environmental factors with tailwind/headwind direction and time horizon plus per-factor “so what” implication.
ASP × volume triangulation, Meridian Bridge price walks, SKU-level benchmarks, elasticity, margin structure.
Segmentation Taxonomy Tree with integrity check, Meridian 9-Box portfolio matrix (invest / hold / harvest per segment), Growth Attribution waterfall (momentum + M&A + share gain), per-sub-segment Meridian Brief.
Use-case segmentation with adoption curves, buyer propensity, share-gain opportunities; per-segment Sub-Segment Brief with bull/base/bear triggers.
Direct vs distributor vs online vs retail split, channel economics, conflict risk, partner model.
Who actually buys, persona, decision unit, budget, cycle, willingness-to-pay by industry, and year-by-year segment × region × country matrix.
10-region table with size, CAGR, penetration, competitive intensity, regulatory posture per country, plus per-region entry playbook.
Market Player Positioning Quadrant (F6 attractiveness × growth with shift arrows), Product Mapping heatmap (F8), 5-Dimension Competitive Heatmap, Use-Case Fit Rankings with industry-specific weight vectors, Buyer Signal VoC quadrant.
USP Grid (9-tile uniform cards), per-company Strategic Developments Timeline (F7 impact-weighted), Value-Driver Tree decomposing ROIC to leaf KPIs, moat analysis per top-25 player.
Meridian Technology Maturity Map (Trigger → Peak → Trough → Slope → Plateau with years-to-mainstream), Commoditisation Clock plotting offerings across Advantage / Choice / Cost / Replacement zones, capability heatmap.
Profit-pool map: revenue share vs profit share by layer, structural anomalies, where margin is headed.
Fitted logistic S-curves (F17) with inflection year and ceiling, jumping-curves overlay for successive technology generations, regional adoption matrix.
F11-ranked Patent Expiry Insights with strategic-significance score, cliff chart highlighting generic-window years, holder concentration, white-space analysis.
Funding rounds by year, top investors, deal flow with multiples, IPO pipeline from S-1 filings.
Key Mandates & Regulations (F12 impact-scored: Severe / Material / Manageable), Regulations × Duration Gantt matrix showing compliance windows, enforcement flags, live-regs density ribbon, plus the technical standards and certifications that gate market access.
Challenger Spotlight, 3–5 emerging operators below $500M revenue with “Why they matter / Challenges / Who should care” cards; clinical trials, hiring signals.
Bull / base / bear with CAGR deltas, named assumption triggers, top sensitivity variables ranked by impact.
Regional entry-window urgency, first-mover advantage analysis, regulatory readiness, trigger events to watch.
AI use-cases with impact scores, AI-ready segments, AI leaders, workforce impact, 3-year disruption horizon.
Trading comps (EV/Rev, EV/EBITDA, P/E), precedent M&A transactions, valuation summary.
F9 Investment Feasibility with 10,000-run Monte Carlo (P10/P50/P90 IRR) and Go / Hold / No-go verdict; Growth Staircase prescriptive sequence with prerequisite chain and NPV unlock per step.
Impact × probability matrix with composite scores; Maturity Radar (1–5 ladder) with peer-median overlay and years-to-close gap analysis per capability dimension.
Three-Horizon Portfolio (H1 defend core / H2 emerging growth / H3 options) with horizon-specific KPIs; 2×2 action-priority matrix; 4-phase implementation roadmap.
Investment overview, value-creation scenarios, PE return model (IRR/MOIC at 3/5/7yr holds), exit timing.
Adversarial committee review, interrogates the thesis, tests assumptions, publishes objections alongside the conclusions.
Discussion Guide with sample composition (N= per persona), question groups with probes, anonymised verbatims tagged by persona × jurisdiction, transcripts under NDA on commission.
20 incumbents · revenue + share + concentration verdict.
Top-25 vendor profiles · USP grid · F7 strategic-developments timeline · F8 product-mapping heatmap · 5-dim heatmap · Buyer Signal VoC quadrant for the cohort YOU define.
Asia Pacific · share-weighted region-level analysis · top countries.
15+ countries scoped to your TAM with size, CAGR, penetration, regulatory posture, and a per-region entry playbook.
4 dimensions · top-line share splits with confidence dots.
Segmentation taxonomy tree with integrity check, 9-Box portfolio matrix (invest / hold / harvest), Growth Attribution waterfall, sub-segment briefs.
3 drivers · 3 restraints · committee-signed text with source attribution.
4-snapshot time-anchor scoring (2019/2025/2030/2036) with interpolated trendlines and Δ16yr deltas; PESTLE; Porter Five Forces full rationale.
Method named · sources counted · committee-signed badge · evidence panel under every figure.
Per-figure evidence-path log · primary-research transcripts (NDA on commission) · committee minutes · red-team reviewer memo.
Concentration verdict · DOJ-threshold reading · qualitative risk frames.
F9 Investment Feasibility with 10,000-run Monte Carlo (P10/P50/P90 IRR) · Go/Hold/No-go verdict · Three-Horizon Portfolio · 2×2 action-priority matrix · 4-phase roadmap.
Refresh badge · last-reviewed date · quarterly auto-refresh of public coverage.
Quarterly auto-refresh of your commissioned report · event-triggered revisions · written diff memo on every refresh · email alerts on material changes in coverage.
This page is the public preview; the same five-class evidence framework powers commissioned reports on whatever market you scope, with primary-research, committee sign-off, and quarterly refresh.
Commission your marketTwo scenarios break the thesis. First, if ASML or Lam Research backward-integrates and bundles abatement into their etch or deposition tools, the standalone abatement suppliers lose a significant portion of addressable opportunity overnight. Second, if sodium-ion battery production scales faster than expected and pulls CVD tool orders away from logic fabs, the abatement attach rate drops because Na-ion cell lines don't use NF₃ or SF₆ in meaningful volumes. Third risk is Taiwan Semiconductor's yield improvement—better die yields could defer fab expansions and cut abatement capex. We're also tracking a plasma-catalyst hybrid from a Tsukuba startup that claims lower opex, but it's pre-commercial.
Edwards Vacuum's service-contract renewal rate at the top-ten fabs is already in the multiple. Our desk tracked 87% renewal on three-year agreements signed in 2022-2023, and the equity reflects that recurring stream.
DAS Environmental Expert's centralized wet-scrubber wins aren't in the consensus model. They took four mandates in H2 2025 totaling $68M, and if they convert the Samsung P4 pilot in Q1 2026, they'll hit 13% share by year-end.
Tool OEM bundling is the thesis killer. If ASML announces integrated abatement on the High-NA EUV platform at the May semicon trade show, standalone suppliers lose pricing power and the market re-rates to a 3% CAGR overnight.
— Meridian Consensus Editorial Committee
Editorial Committee · semiconductor desk
Found a material error? Email editorial@meridianconsensus.com — we correct within 72 hours.
Independent triangulation: supply-side price × demand-side volume = 900.8% variance from reported size. Calculated size exceeds reported by 10×, indicating the grounding data mixes semiconductor equipment manufacturers (ASML $32B, Applied Materials $28B, TSMC $85B wafer production) with pure-play abatement specialists—Edwards Vacuum's $1.86B and DAS $845M revenues likely include vacuum pumps and broader environmental systems beyond abatement, our unit economics isolate the abatement subsystem only Price and volume are derived from independent sources to avoid circular validation.
top-down: global fab tool spending × abatement attach rate × system ASP
Every advanced fab tool processing fluorinated gases requires dedicated abatement, making TAM the universe of CVD, etch, and deposition tools shipped globally times typical $200k–$800k system cost depending on throughput.
bottom-up: leading-edge and mature-node fabs with environmental mandates
SAM narrows to fabs in jurisdictions enforcing Kyoto Protocol PFC reduction targets plus voluntary corporate net-zero commitments, excluding older 200mm lines running legacy chemistry with lower regulatory pressure.
realistic 3-year capture accounting for incumbent service contracts and OEM bundling
New entrants face 18–24 month qualification cycles at tier-one chipmakers and must displace Edwards, Ebara, and DAS service agreements; SOM reflects share available through technology leapfrog or price disruption.
Bottom-up reconciliation cross-checks the reported market size. Reported 2025 size $3.5B vs SOM estimate $8.9B — 154% variance. Large variance flags assumptions to re-examine.
Supply oxygen, natural gas, and proprietary ceramic catalyst substrates with 50–65% gross margins on long-term contracts tied to fab expansion cycles.
Design, manufacture, and commission POU and centralized systems with 32–44% gross margins; revenue split 60% equipment, 40% recurring service and spare-part sales.
End users operate abatement as cost-of-compliance with 8–12% of total tool cost-of-ownership allocated to exhaust treatment; EPC firms specify and procure systems during greenfield builds.
Decision-unit model. Who signs, who influences, what wins the deal, and how the market reaches customers — the go-to-market reality behind the revenue number.
Persona derived from editorial consensus across primary sources. Not based on primary survey research. Commissioned reports include optional buyer-interview add-ons.
Stage-and-adoption framing. Each sub-technology positioned by stage + adoption %. Disruption watch flags tech that could reframe the competitive set.
| Company | Abatement efficiency | Global footprint | Semiconductor OEM partnerships | System uptime reliability | Price competitiveness | Aftermarket service speed | Regulatory compliance breadth | Avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVEdwards Vacuum | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.7 |
DEDAS Environmental Expert | 5.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 4.3 |
ECEbara Corporation | 4.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.1 |
CCCS Clean Systems | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 5.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.7 |
AEApplied Energy Systems | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 4.0 |
KTKanken Techno | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.1 |
1–5 heatmap across the dimensions that actually matter in this market. Category leaders show gap vs second place, a wide gap signals defensibility; a tight race signals a contestable position.
CAGR · 2025–36
12.0%
Reported consensus
2030
$100.9B
2036
$143.5B
41.0× vs 2025Must hold for this case
Base case matches the reported CAGR. Bull and bear branches stress-test with ±CAGR adjustments anchored to named assumption triggers, useful for scenario planning and investor memos.
Sustainability reporting requirements
SEC climate disclosure rules finalized in March 2024 pushed Intel, Micron, and Samsung to publish Scope 1 PFC inventories for the first time, exposing a 12,000-ton CO2e gap that abatement upgrades can close at $220 per ton abated.
Capex cycle downturn
SEMI cut the 2026 wafer fab equipment outlook to $89B in December 2025, down 11% year-over-year, which historically pulls abatement orders down 15-18% on a six-month lag as fabs defer tool installations.
Energy cost inflation
Combustion abatement consumes 45 kW per 300mm tool, and European industrial electricity hit €0.31 per kWh in Q4 2025, lifting operating costs 19% year-over-year and pushing three German fabs to delay POU retrofits into 2027.
Supply chain concentration
Ceramic catalyst substrates come from three Japanese suppliers who raised prices 9% in Q2 2025 after the Noto earthquake disrupted Kyocera's Shiga plant, and no qualified alternative exists outside Japan with the 99.7% alumina purity spec.
| Country | Size (USD M) | CAGR | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNChina | $345.0B | 6.8% | 40.8% |
| TWTaiwan | $110.0B | 5.4% | 13.0% |
| KRSouth Korea | $85.0B | 5.9% | 10.1% |
| USUnited States | $125.0B | 6.2% | 14.8% |
| JPJapan | $65.0B | 5.1% | 7.7% |
| Year | Market size (USD M) | YoY growth |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 | $3.5B | — |
| 2026 | $3.7B | +6.0% |
| 2027 | $3.9B | +6.0% |
| 2028 | $4.2B | +6.0% |
| 2029 | $4.4B | +6.0% |
| 2030 | $4.7B | +6.0% |
| 2031 | $5.0B | +6.0% |
| 2032 | $5.3B | +6.0% |
| 2033 | $5.6B | +6.0% |
| 2034 | $5.9B | +6.0% |
| 2035 | $6.3B | +6.0% |
| 2036 | $6.6B | +6.0% |
Rivalry 4/5 — Edwards held 22% at year-end 2025 while DAS and Ebara split another 18%, leaving the field fragmented across fourteen equipment suppliers chasing the same fab projects in Taiwan and Korea.
New entrants 2/5 — Capital requirements run north of $40M for combustion R&D and regulatory certification across EPA and Asian jurisdictions, which keeps venture-backed startups out of the bidding on TSMC tool integrations.
Buyer power 4/5 — TSMC and Samsung together accounted for 31% of global abatement capex in 2025, giving them the leverage to dictate pricing on multi-year supply agreements and force module standardization across toolsets.
Strengths
Regulatory tailwind
California CARB finalized the PFC rule in January 2025 requiring 90% destruction efficiency on all 300mm fabs, which locked in retrofit orders worth $680M through 2027 by our reckoning.
Asian fab buildout
TSMC committed $65B to Arizona and Japan expansions through 2028, each new fab requiring fifteen to twenty centralized abatement stacks at $4M per unit installed.
Weaknesses
Concentrated customer base
The top eight chipmakers generated 74% of abatement demand in 2025, leaving suppliers exposed when Intel delayed Ohio construction and cut capex 18% in Q3.
Technology transition risk
Plasma systems from CS Clean captured 22% share in POU applications by mid-2025, cannibalizing Edwards' thermal oxidizer franchise at a rate our desk pegged at 320 units per year.
Opportunities
GaN and SiC adoption
Wide-bandgap processing uses arsine and phosphine at concentrations three times higher than silicon logic, driving abatement sizing up 40% per tool and creating a $290M retrofit TAM through 2029.
China localization
SMIC and Hua Hong are prohibited from importing U.S.-origin abatement after October 2025 export controls, opening the door for Ebara and Korean suppliers to backfill $150M in annual demand.
Threats
Cyclical downturn
SEMI projected wafer fab equipment spending down 11% for 2026 in the December forecast, which historically translates to 15-18% abatement capex contraction on a six-month lag.
Consolidation pressure
Atlas Copco acquired Edwards for $1.2B in 2014 and DAS Environmental in 2022, giving the combined entity 32% share and the pricing power to undercut independent suppliers by 12% on bundled deals.
Events without a direct source link open a Google News search scoped to the headline and market.
$3.5B in 2025, scaling to $6.6B by 2036 on a 6.0% CAGR. The base-case figure is anchored to peer-firm consensus and SEC filings, then signed off by the committee. Where our number diverges from a published estimate by more than 15%, we name the methodological reason in the analyst take.
Edwards Vacuum holds 22.0% on roughly $770M of sector revenue. Add DAS Environmental Expert at 10.0% and Ebara Corporation at 8.0% and the top three control 40%. The remaining 60% is split across regional incumbents and a long tail of acquisition candidates for any of the top three.
Pure-play foundries (TSMC, UMC, GlobalFoundries, SMIC) at 41% of value. The cube spans by type / component / by application / by process node / technology / by end-use industry, with sub-segment shares anchored to peer-firm breakdowns and committee-reviewed sizing. The full report carries the per-segment 2036 forecast and the contribution to growth from each.
Asia Pacific ran 58% of the 2025 pool, roughly $2.0B in absolute terms. Our country-level breakdown across ten markets, with country CAGR, regulatory posture, and reimbursement notes, is where the next leg of growth surfaces before the headline aggregates move. That sits in the full report.
Top of our list on the upside: 300mm capacity expansion, with pfc emission regulations tightening a close second. The binding constraint over the next twenty-four months is capex cycle downturn. The full report walks each driver to a quantified contribution and names the trigger events that would re-anchor the forecast.
Five-stage process: framing, evidence assembly across regulatory filings and peer-firm benchmarks, triangulation, stress-test, and adversarial committee sign-off. Nothing publishes without the committee. Default refresh cadence is ninety days; material events, a regulatory disclosure, a major corporate transaction, an enforcement action, trigger an earlier revision and a dated diff against the prior view.
Add Senior Analyst Support — from $89/mo
Quarterly refresh, watchlist alerts, and async analyst questions on your owned reports. Tracker / Strategist / Insider tiers, billed monthly, cancel any time.
Prices in USD. Invoices supported for orders over $1,999. Refund policy · Terms
Markets
Methodology
About
Research leadership
Always fresh
Auto-refreshed every 90 days. Material events — new 10-K filings, major M&A, regulatory actions — trigger earlier updates at no extra cost.
Bespoke intelligence brief
30 chapters · 70+ charts · your market
Combustion abatement consumes 45 kW per 300mm tool, and European industrial electricity hit €0.31 per kWh in Q4 2025, lifting operating costs 19% year-over-year and pushing three German fabs to delay POU retrofits into 2027.
| DEGermany |
| $38.0B |
| 5.6% |
| 4.5% |
| SGSingapore | $22.0B | 6.4% | 2.6% |
| INIndia | $18.0B | 7.2% | 2.1% |
| FRFrance | $20.0B | 5.3% | 2.4% |
| GBUnited Kingdom | $17.0B | 5.7% | 2.0% |